A. Raising limits on individual contributions
- In favor: Raised limitations on individual contributions will even the playing field for all so that no candidate receives a lot more money than another.
- Against: Some people believe limitations on individual contributions are a violation of freedom of speech.
B. Eliminating Soft Money
- In favor: Citizens believe that all contributors should be held to the same standard and no one contributor should be allowed to slip money to a candidate through an organization.
- Against: Citizens believe that money limitations are unlawful and in order to support their chosen candidate, they've found a loophole
C. Citizens United is a conservative organization that believes money is the equivalent to speech. They affect the proposals because they strongly oppose limitations and have the power to do so. Their arguments are legitament.
No comments:
Post a Comment